| From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Defaults for GUC variables (was Re: pg_ctl reports |
| Date: | 2003-10-28 01:24:53 |
| Message-ID: | 3F9DC565.6070400@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 |
> However, you're not the first to get burnt by this mis-assumption,
> so maybe we should do something about it.
>
> The low-tech solution to this would be to stop listing the default
> values as commented-out entries, but just make them ordinary uncommented
> entries. That way people who think "undoing my edit will revert the
> change" would be right.
I would be in favour of that way of doing things. I have always found
it weird that defaults were commented out...
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2003-10-28 01:44:21 | Re: Still a few flaws in configure's default CFLAGS selection |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-10-27 22:53:04 | Re: round() function wrong? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Manfred Koizar | 2003-10-28 11:38:53 | Re: Defaults for GUC variables (was Re: pg_ctl reports succes when start fails) |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-10-27 19:03:39 | Re: pg_ctl reports succes when start fails |