Re: Ant version detection

From: Barry Lind <blind(at)xythos(dot)com>
To: Johann Uhrmann <johann(dot)uhrmann(at)xpecto(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Ant version detection
Date: 2003-10-23 15:57:04
Message-ID: 3F97FA50.7090409@xythos.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Johann,

I would suggest putting together a rough proposal of what functionality
you want to add (and if appropriate how you want to add it) and send it
to the pgsql-jdbc mail list. Then incorporate the feedback you get from
the community.

thanks,
--Barry

Johann Uhrmann wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Johann Uhrmann <johann(dot)uhrmann(at)xpecto(dot)com> writes:
>>
>>> ... Therefore, only lines
>>> beginning with "Apache Ant version" should be considered.
>>
>>
>>
>> Do *all* versions of Ant identify themselves that way? I'd be inclined
>> to write
>> grep -i "ant version"
>> instead.
>
>
> I agree, that seems a lot more stable.
>
> By the way, I am going to write a patch for asynchronous notification
> for the jdbc driver. (I hope I'll find some time to get it done.)
>
> What development guides are the best to start with?
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Hans
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-23 17:36:33 Re: beta5 references beta4 in INSTALL
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-10-23 14:30:45 Tutorial fixes