Re: Recomended FS

From: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Recomended FS
Date: 2003-10-22 08:57:08
Message-ID: 3F964664.80303@paradise.net.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I have found this as well -

I have a nice simple example of a program that loops and occasionally
writes a block to a file.
On a 2 cpu machine, running 2 of these processes in parallel takes twice
as long as running just 1 process!
However if I comment out the IO, then 2 processes takes the same elapsed
time as 1.

My conclusion is there exists some sort of "big" lock on access to the
ATA array.

I believe that 3ware have a non blocking implementation of ATA RAID -
I intend to sell the Promise and obtain a 3ware in the next month of so
and test this out.

regards

Mark

Andrew Sullivan wrote:

>That said, even the 2-way RAID became almost uselessly slow when
>multiple queries were running -- indeed, dramatically slower than a
>plain single IDE drive.
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message 博 翟 2003-10-22 09:12:45 where is pg_views
Previous Message Mark Kirkwood 2003-10-22 08:48:12 Re: Recomended FS