From: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, jm(at)poure(dot)com, Bruno LEVEQUE <bruno(dot)leveque(at)net6d(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Vincent Harcq <vha(at)audaxis(dot)com>, Jean-Paul ARGUDO <jpargudo(at)free(dot)fr> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Mapping Oracle types to PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2003-10-22 00:41:57 |
Message-ID: | 3F95D255.9080304@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Hi Scott,
scott.marlowe wrote:
<snip>
>
> But if what he wants is nested transactions, then I could see him paying
> for development providing better ROI than forking the code. Is that what
> was meant by "the right kind of transaction support" ?
Yep, that's what was needed. :-)
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-10-22 07:21:51 | Open Groupware |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-21 22:22:52 | Re: [HACKERS] Mapping Oracle types to PostgreSQL types |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-10-22 01:24:51 | Re: multi-backend psql |
Previous Message | Bob Badour | 2003-10-21 22:52:18 | Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL |