From: | Marsh Ray <marsh-pg(at)mysteray(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL general list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing) |
Date: | 2003-10-10 01:44:17 |
Message-ID: | 3F860EF1.90207@mysteray.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Oliver Elphick wrote:
> But as far as Debian is concerned, paragraph 1 applies:
>
>1. Free use for those who are 100% GPL
>
>If your application is licensed under GPL or compatible OSI license
>approved by MySQL AB, you are free and welcome to ship any GPL software
>of MySQL AB with your application. By "application" we mean any type of
>software application, system, tool or utility. For doing this, you do
>not need a separate signed agreement with MySQL AB, because the GPL text
>is sufficient...
>
>That makes it free under the Debian Free Software Guidelines, so I have
>no grounds for requesting its removal. :-(
>
>
Just out of curiosity, what does Debian make MySQL's rather bizarre
interpretaion of the GPL:
http://www.mysql.com/documentation/mysql/bychapter/manual_Introduction.html#Copyright
--- begin quote ----
You need a commercial license:
[...]
When you distribute a non-|GPL| application that *only* works with
the |MySQL| software and ship it with the |MySQL| software. This type of
solution is considered to be linking even if it's done over a network.
--- end quote ----
"Linking over a network"? What stops some GPL'ed web server (or
commercial one for that matter) from demanding non-free licensing for
web clients that connect to it?
- Marsh
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris | 2003-10-10 01:46:20 | Re: Can SQL return a threaded-comment-view result set? |
Previous Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2003-10-10 01:30:32 | Re: Parent Id |