Re: Possible Commit Syntax Change for Improved TPS

From: Adrian Maier <am(at)fx(dot)ro>
To: Seun Osewa <seunosewa(at)inaira(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Possible Commit Syntax Change for Improved TPS
Date: 2003-10-08 08:43:57
Message-ID: 3F83CE4D.4090902@fx.ro
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Seun Osewa wrote:
> I observed that in in many applications there are some transactions
> that are more critical than others. I may have the same database
> instance managing website visitor accounting and financial
> transactions. I could tolerate the loss of a few transactions whose
> only job is to tell me a user has clicked a page on my website but
> would not dare risk this for any of the "real" financials work my
> web-based app is doing.

It is possible to split the data over 2 database clusters:
one which contains "important" data (this cluster will be configured
with fsync enabled), and a second one that contains the less
important data (configured with fsync=off for speed reasons).

Cheers,

Adrian Maier
(am(at)fx(dot)ro)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Manfred Koizar 2003-10-08 09:31:30 Re: [HACKERS] Cannot dump/restore text value \N
Previous Message Allie Micka 2003-10-08 06:54:23 plpgsql overloading bug in 7.3.2 on OS X