Re: ADD FOREIGN KEY (was Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta)

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, Peter Childs <Blue(dot)Dragon(at)blueyonder(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ADD FOREIGN KEY (was Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta)
Date: 2003-09-29 05:14:31
Message-ID: 3F77BFB7.3060205@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers


> I think the advantages of choice (b) are obvious --- it doesn't allow
> bogus data to be loaded accidentally, and it doesn't create a problem
> with loading existing 7.3 dump files that don't know how to suppress the
> check.

OK, I didn't realise there was a (b). I volunteer to do speed tests on
data reloading on real data for our site.

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Relaxin 2003-09-29 07:21:43 Re: downloading latest source from cvs
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-09-29 04:28:47 Re: ADD FOREIGN KEY (was Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2003-09-29 05:33:19 Re: 2-phase commit
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2003-09-29 05:05:03 Re: 2-phase commit