Re: PL contribution guidelines?

From: "mlg7" <mlg7(at)yandex(dot)ru>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: PL contribution guidelines?
Date: 2003-09-27 12:43:53
Message-ID: 3F758609.000007.20894@tide.yandex.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> mlg3 writes:
>
> > I understand that pgsql uses autoconf but not other autotools.
> > The best location for such contribution is in
> > src/pl/pl<lang-name>
> >
> > Now, how do I include my PL into the build list?
> > What files must I provide? (preferrably, by borrowing
> > them from another PL, e.g. PLPERL or TCL])
>
> There is currently some disagreement about whether every now procedural
> language implementation should be included in the core distribution. If
> you choose to distribute your package separately, you can take a look at
> http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/plsh.html as an example for how to
> package it.

1)
Is there a centralized list of pgsql PL's ?

2)
At that URL, I see:
pgplsh-1.0-7.3.tar.gz 17-Dec-2002 19:17 244k GZIP compressed docume>
pgplsh-20010821.tar.gz 23-Sep-2002 18:08 99k GZIP compressed docume>
pgplsh-20010914.tar.gz 23-Sep-2002 18:08 101k GZIP compressed docume>
pgplsh-20011005.tar.gz 23-Sep-2002 18:08 102k GZIP compressed docume>
which version should I prefer? What is the difference between them?

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-09-27 14:16:34 Re: PL contribution guidelines?
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-09-27 12:13:27 Re: 2-phase commit