| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: initdb failure |
| Date: | 2003-09-26 19:18:37 |
| Message-ID: | 3F74910D.7070502@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Tom Lane wrote:
>>I don't mind if we keep it on pure-POSIX platforms. But one of the nicer
>>developments on Windows in recent(?) times is that you can actually use
>>any kind of line separator and most programs still work correctly (with
>>the notable exception of Notepad).
>>
>>
>
>Not sure if we should make the behavior Windows-specific though. And
>didn't Michael report seeing the same initdb failure on Debian? That
>confuses me a bit --- why would there be a newline discrepancy on Debian?
>
>
>
Is this affected by the fact that the platform where a dump is made
might have a different line-end discipline from the one where the dump
is restored?
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-09-26 19:30:17 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |
| Previous Message | Holger Marzen | 2003-09-26 19:06:08 | Re: mod_auth_pgsql & encryption |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-09-26 19:30:17 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-26 19:05:58 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-09-26 19:30:17 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-26 19:05:58 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |