| From: | Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Subject: | Re: Improving REINDEX for system indexes (long) |
| Date: | 2003-09-23 14:28:27 |
| Message-ID: | 3F70588B.3030407@bigfoot.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
Gaetano Mendola [mailto:mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com] wrote:
>>
>>Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
>>
>>>instead. Because it was impossible to make REINDEX transaction-safe
>>>then, such flag was needed to suppress inconsistency as less
>>>as possible.
>>
>>This mean that the actual REINDEX is not transaction-safe ?
>
>
> No.
> It was not transaction-safe long time ago.
Anyway I think there is a nasty bug somewhere, see my last posts
about "duplication primary key".
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-23 15:11:34 | pgsql-server/src/backend/executor spi.c |
| Previous Message | Michael Meskes | 2003-09-23 12:56:35 | pgsql-server/src/interfaces/ecpg ChangeLog pre ... |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Joseph Krogh | 2003-09-23 14:50:43 | Re: free(3)-ing variables in pg_dump |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-09-23 14:25:19 | Re: free(3)-ing variables in pg_dump |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Irina Sourikova | 2003-09-23 16:59:33 | bug in vacuumlo? |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2003-09-23 10:45:16 | Re: Improving REINDEX for system indexes (long) |