| From: | Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)fireserve(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ben <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PgSQL General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: High-volume shop uses PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2003-09-17 23:09:37 |
| Message-ID: | 3F68E9B1.9080001@fireserve.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
And on this issue, how does Postgres work better on the web server farm
that than other DBMSs?
I thought it actually had achilles heels in that kind of usage?
i.e.
One postmaster
No extents (or whatever thta word is)
Didn't work well with SAN's
Ben wrote:
>high: mainframe
>wide: web server farm
>
>On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Andrew L. Gould wrote:
>
>
>
>>On Wednesday 17 September 2003 04:56 pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>
>>
>>>http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=1482975508&fp=16&fpid=0
>>>
>>>
>>I do not understand what people mean when they differentiate between scaling
>>vertically versus scaling horizontally.
>>
>>Would someone provide a brief explanation?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Andrew Gould
>>
>>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>>TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Wille | 2003-09-17 23:18:46 | Sort order is different on Windows and Linux |
| Previous Message | Dennis Gearon | 2003-09-17 23:06:31 | Re: High-volume shop uses PostgreSQL |