Re: need for in-place upgrades (was Re: State of

From: Lamar Owen <lowen(at)pari(dot)edu>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh(at)pop(dot)jaring(dot)my>, PgSQL General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: need for in-place upgrades (was Re: State of
Date: 2003-09-15 19:40:00
Message-ID: 3F661590.5090701@pari.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> It is alot but is is not a lot for something like an Insurance company
> or a bank. Also 100TB is probably non-compressed although 30TB is still
> large.

Our requirements are such that this figure is our best guess after
compression. The amount of data prior to compression is much larger,
and consists of highly compressible astronomical observations in FITS
format.
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2003-09-15 19:43:31 Re: State of Beta 2
Previous Message Holger Marzen 2003-09-15 19:15:00 Re: Space