Re: Another small bug (pg_autovacuum)

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> writes:
>> I made a patch to fix this, but in testing it I noticed that the stats
>> system doesn't work on shared tables as I was expecting it too (as my
>> latest patch requires it too :-). It treats instances of shared tables
>> in separate databases as totally unique tables.
>
> Hmm. The bufmgr and lower levels handle shared tables by always
> associating a database number of zero with them, but I'll bet that the
> pg_stats stuff does not do that. I'd call that a bug, yes. Jan, any
> thoughts on how complex to fix?

Need to take a look into, but I agree that this is a bug.

Jan

--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #