Re: TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken?
Date: 2003-09-05 15:18:30
Message-ID: 3F58A946.5010408@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Creager wrote:

>Once upon a time (Fri, 05 Sep 2003 03:16:54 -0400)
>Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> uttered something amazingly similar to:
>
>
>
>>Could we get the configure script to do it instead, since it too should
>>know about ip6 capability? (I guess then we'd have
>>pg_hba.conf.sample.in). That strikes me as being a lot cleaner.
>>
>>
>>
>
>What about RPM users?
>
>Cheers,
>Rob
>
>
>
My recollection is that RPM builds use configure, so they would be just
fine, I think.

The same consideration would apply to using initdb, of course.

But Tom doesn't like it so I guess it's moot.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai 2003-09-05 15:18:58 Re: 64-bit pgsql
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-05 15:17:35 checkpoints too frequent