Re: Is it a memory leak in PostgreSQL 7.4beta?

From: Hans-Jürgen Schönig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is it a memory leak in PostgreSQL 7.4beta?
Date: 2003-09-01 07:40:20
Message-ID: 3F52F7E4.2050306@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I am seeing a slow but steady growth of the backend process on a Linux
> box (RHL 8.0) --- top shows it growing a few K every few seconds.
>
> But I see *zero* growth with the same test on HPUX 10.20.
>
> A possible wild card is that the Postgres build I'm using on the Linux
> box is compiled for profiling (-pg, no --enable-debug or --enable-cassert)
> whereas the HPUX build has --enable-debug and --enable-cassert but no
> profiling. I'm not aware that there's any known memory leakage in
> Linux' profiling support, though.
>
> Can anyone else reproduce this, or confirm they don't see it? What
> platform, and what configure options?

I have tried it on our Ultra Sparc 10 running Debian (Woody).
Same problem.
The postmaster starts at around 2.2mb and keeps allocating memory :(
Maybe I can test it on AIX within the next two weeks (still waiting for
the machine to come).

Regards,

Hans

--
Cybertec Geschwinde u Schoenig
Ludo-Hartmannplatz 1/14, A-1160 Vienna, Austria
Tel: +43/2952/30706; +43/664/233 90 75
www.cybertec.at, www.postgresql.at, kernel.cybertec.at

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julian Mehnle 2003-09-01 08:41:38 "Allow inherited tables to inherit index/primary key" -- about when?
Previous Message Hans-Jürgen Schönig 2003-09-01 06:07:20 Re: Is it a memory leak in PostgreSQL 7.4beta?