Re: Functions have 32 args limt ???

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Ivar <ivar(at)lumisoft(dot)ee>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Functions have 32 args limt ???
Date: 2003-08-28 15:35:02
Message-ID: 3F4E2126.6010902@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Ivar wrote:
> I don't see why default is so small.
>

Did you even bother to look at the thread I referred to?

There was a lengthy discussion on the pros and cons of various default
settings, and the consensus of the community was 32. If you'd like to
make a cogent argument for why it ought to be higher, by all means do
so. But you'll have to convince quite a few people who have no need for
greater than 32 arguments why they should suffer a performance hit just
because you do.

Joe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dennis Gearon 2003-08-28 15:38:16 Re: Functions have 32 args limt ???
Previous Message Sune Nielsen 2003-08-28 15:27:44 Re: Problems with transactions and sequences