Re: Package naming conventions

From: Raphaël Enrici <blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr>
To: jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Package naming conventions
Date: 2003-08-09 19:41:03
Message-ID: 3F354E4F.4080309@club-internet.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Jean-Michel POURE wrote:

> It will take me some time because I have to rebuild
>
>wxWindows as well. I missed the information to upgrade to 20030722...
>
I missed it too... Did you find any mail concerning this ? Wasn't it a
wx snap that was about to become the supported one but gave some problem
at the last minute ?
To me, the last good known and supported one was 20030707...
Dave, Andreas ?

>Cheers,
>Jean-Michel (from Bretagne!!!)
>
>
Please kiss the ocean for me.

Raphaël

In response to

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2003-08-09 20:48:18 Re: [Fwd: Re: [pgadmin-support] [Fwd: problem downloading/installing pgadmin3 on Debian testing]]
Previous Message Jean-Michel POURE 2003-08-09 19:24:46 Re: Package naming conventions