| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: hexadecimal to decimal |
| Date: | 2003-07-31 03:59:25 |
| Message-ID: | 3F28941D.1070008@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Presumably, the 50 msec difference represents the time to load up the
> perl library and initialize a perl interpreter.
>
> It might help if libperl were to be preloaded into the postmaster in the
> way you created ...
>
I tried that after I posted, but only saw roughly 30% improvement (which
is consistent with my earlier tests IIRC). Not bad, but this still left
plperl initial call at ~40 msec versus plpgsql at ~4 msec. It is
possible that the initialization function that I used,
plperl_init_all(), doesn't include everything it could. I might play
around with it when I get a few moments.
Joe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-07-31 04:13:19 | Re: hexadecimal to decimal |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-07-31 03:56:07 | Re: hexadecimal to decimal |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-07-31 04:13:19 | Re: hexadecimal to decimal |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-07-31 03:56:07 | Re: hexadecimal to decimal |