| From: | "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 7.4 Press Release -- Draft #3 |
| Date: | 2003-07-23 14:16:47 |
| Message-ID: | 3F1EE627.10389.52F1249@localhost |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 23 Jul 2003 at 8:43, Robert Treat wrote:
> Hmm... do you just dislike the way I used support? Lets flip it to match
> the original wording:
>
> PostgreSQL 7.4 expands 64 bit support to include AMD Opteron in
> addition to other 64 bit platforms including PA-RISC, Sparc, S/390,
> MIPS, Alpha, and RS6000*
>
> or maybe better is:
>
> PostgreSQL 7.4 expands 64 bit compatibility to include AMD Opteron in
> addition to other 64 bit platforms including PA-RISC, Sparc, S/390,
> MIPS, Alpha, and RS6000*
How about postgresql is capable of taking advantage of 64bit hardware
architecture? I mean if it can make work with 4GB dataset just like that, it
will say lot better than a vague "support"
Just a thought..
Bye
Shridhar
--
"[In 'Doctor' mode], I spent a good ten minutes telling Emacs what Ithought of
it. (The response was, 'Perhaps you could try to be lessabusive.')"(By Matt
Welsh)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-07-23 14:17:59 | Re: 7.4 Press Release -- Draft #3 |
| Previous Message | Jeff | 2003-07-23 14:08:58 | Re: 7.4 Press Release -- Draft #3 |