Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle

From: "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>
To: Jochem van Dieten <jochemd(at)oli(dot)tudelft(dot)nl>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle
Date: 2003-07-22 06:31:05
Message-ID: 3F1D2781.24476.32A50EB@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 21 Jul 2003 at 22:35, Jochem van Dieten wrote:

> Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> >
> > e.g. Virtual private database? What is that? Unless I know what to expect out
> > of that functionality, how can anybody offer an opinion or material on that?
> >
> > A link explaining what is virtual private database would be great there. Like
> > http://www.oracle-base.com/Articles/8i/VirtualPrivateDatabases(VPD).asp.
>
> *That* is called a Virtual Private Database? It is just a fancy
> way to do row level security on a single table in the database.
> That article should be called "How to fake an updateable view
> with check option.".

Well, no matter how you and me thinks this is not very relevant or of any
practical use, tons of people use it/will use it because oracle offers it to
them.

Sigh... there are quite a lot of things that are not ideal. Definition of ideal
is one of them..:-)

Bye
Shridhar

--
First law of debate: Never argue with a fool. People might not know the
difference.

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2003-07-22 12:34:28 Re: 7.4 Press Release -- Draft #3
Previous Message Sean Chittenden 2003-07-22 03:13:18 Re: 7.4 Press Release -- Draft #3