From: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | Hiroshi Saito <saito(at)inetrt(dot)skcapi(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SystemObject show patch more. |
Date: | 2003-07-16 16:17:06 |
Message-ID: | 3F157A82.1040003@pse-consulting.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Dave Page wrote:
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Hiroshi Saito [mailto:saito(at)inetrt(dot)skcapi(dot)co(dot)jp]
>>Sent: 16 July 2003 06:58
>>To: Hiroshi Saito
>>Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org; Dave Page
>>Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] SystemObject show patch more.
>>
>>
>>Hi Andreas.
>>
>>One more.
>>pgLanguage patch.
>>
>>Check it.
>>
>>
>>
>
>Hi Hiroshi,
>
>I beleive the SQL changes you have made are incorrect. The validator is
>optional (not the handler) so should use the left outer join, and we
>want lanispl = TRUE to get only user defined procedural languages. In
>actual fact, I think that's best removed altogether, and SystemObject =
>(lanispl == FALSE); so that with SystemObjects on, we see SQL & C etc.
>
>
>
I thought about it, but the languages with lanispl=false would have to
be handled separatlely (lanistrusted is meaningless), and you can't
learn anything from built-in languages. We know pgsql can SQL, don't we?
Regards,
Andreas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2003-07-16 16:21:17 | Re: Some help |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2003-07-16 12:08:20 | pgAdmin III Screenshots |