Re: Break referential integrity.

From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
Cc: Rudi Starcevic <rudi(at)oasis(dot)net(dot)au>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Break referential integrity.
Date: 2003-07-09 19:06:34
Message-ID: 3F0C67BA.2050209@Yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Stephan Szabo wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Rudi Starcevic wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I know that if you have a trigger and function then drop/replace the
>> function the trigger needs
>> to be drop/replaced too so that it can see the new function.
>>
>> Is it the same for Ref. Integ. on table's too ?
>>
>> If table B's foreign key references table A and you drop/replace table A
>> then the reference from table B to table A is broken and needs to be
>> recreated ?
>
> In recent versions, you should not be drop table A without specifying
> cascade which will drop the constraint for you (and thus you'll need to
> recreate it). In older versions, I'm not 100% sure what'd happen, but you
> probably should drop and recreate it for good measure.

Older versions spit out a NOTICE and dropped the constraint, so they
kinda defaulted to CASCADE.

Jan

--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael A Nachbaur 2003-07-09 21:14:19 Home-brewed table syncronization
Previous Message Yasir Malik 2003-07-09 18:55:04 Re: Datatype conversion help