Re: Change the behaviour of the SERIAL "Type"

Randall Lucas wrote:

>
> Wow, I had never actually faced this problem (yet) but I spied it as a
> possible stumbling block for porting MySQL apps, for which the
> standard practice is inserting a NULL. As I have made a fairly
> thorough reading of the docs (but may have not cross-correlated every
> piece of data yet, obviously), I was surprised to find I hadn't
> figured this out myself. It /seems/ obvious in retrospect, but it
> really baked my noodle when I first looked at some ugly MySQL queries.
>
> Respectfully, then, I move that a sentence outlining this
> functionality be added to User Manual section 5.1.4, "The Serial
> Types." Furthermore, anyone who has written or is writing a MySQL
> porting guide should include this, if he hasn't.

Yea, fine, but I propose a different (deeper) approach.
Why does SERIAL only enforce a DEFAULT?
This is not an exact imitation of an autoincrement, as a DEFAULT can be
overwritten.
In my oppinion, SERIAL should implicitly create a Trigger on the table,
which then
handles this transparently.
Would that be difficult?
(I am already writing a Procedure which gets all the info needed out of
the Catalog,
but my problem is that I need some dynamic statements in there...)

Cheers, Dani