Re: Name limitation question

From: Kaarel <kaarel(at)future(dot)ee>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Laura Nichols <LNichols(at)oacis(dot)com>, pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Name limitation question
Date: 2003-06-25 11:53:24
Message-ID: 3EF98D34.8050101@future.ee
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

>>We had a limit of first 31, then 63 characters. Either in 7.3 or in 7.4
>>(beta) that was extended to 128 characters, which should be enough for
>>anybody.
>
>
> No, the default is still 63, and will probably stay there. You can
> however alter NAMEDATALEN when building the software, if you are hot
> to have a different limit.

Isn't the SQL standard 128 chars?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nabil Sayegh 2003-06-25 13:36:31 Re: recursive function needs static variable
Previous Message Joe Conway 2003-06-25 04:35:19 Re: recursive function needs static variable