| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andreas Pflug <Andreas(dot)Pflug(at)web(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: allowed user/db variables |
| Date: | 2003-06-25 06:45:28 |
| Message-ID: | 3EF94508.6010300@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>>See my followup. Which bits of info would you like to see added that
>>SHOW doesn't reveal?
>
> Unlike andreas, I'm not interested in the types and ranges of values, what I
> need to know is the GUC variables that the user is allowed to set, in
> particular what they can ALTER USER / SET ... so that I can display that
> feature...
>
I was considering adding this and the stuff Andreas requested to
pg_settings (but not "SHOW ALL" or "SHOW x" unless people feel it's
important to kept them consistent with pg_settings). Were the Red Hat
guys going to do this?
Joe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-06-25 06:55:41 | Re: [GENERAL] Physical Database Configuration |
| Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-06-25 06:36:37 | Re: Physical Database Configuration |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-06-25 06:56:18 | Re: allowed user/db variables |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2003-06-25 06:15:16 | Re: bytea char escaping |