Re: [GENERAL] MySQL gets $19.5 MM

From: Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)cvc(dot)net>
To: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] MySQL gets $19.5 MM
Date: 2003-06-20 17:00:12
Message-ID: 3EF33D9C.5070003@cvc.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general

That's a good, mabye better model!

Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:57:07AM -0700, Dennis Gearon wrote:
>
>>But others are right. We need someone like IBM is to Linux, or Apple is to
>>Konqueror. Someone who puts a lot of time and money into the product for
>>their own selfish interests, but then releases it.
>
>
> I disagree. I think what PostgreSQL really needs is a few companies
> who are willing to underwrite a developer or two a piece. Or, maybe
> more precisely, _several_ companies to do that. The only thing
> currently missing in the community, therefore, is the "several" part,
> IMO.
>
> A
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 2003-06-20 18:52:05 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] MySQL gets $19.5 MM
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2003-06-20 16:12:20 Re: [GENERAL] MySQL gets $19.5 MM

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-06-20 17:01:14 Re: [HACKERS] psql
Previous Message Doug McNaught 2003-06-20 16:57:57 Re: dropping sequences