From: | "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Estimate of when CVS will be available again? |
Date: | 2003-06-10 05:12:25 |
Message-ID: | 3EE5B611.13846.7FBC1C8@localhost |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 8 Jun 2003 at 23:52, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> Performance for cvs update over pserver is abysmal and pretty hard on
> the server, though easy on the client. If the cvs server gets bogged
> down, then it may be worth while to look into this and make a call for
> mirrors. Is this an issue? Putting the lock files on an mfs
> partition also helps (generally needed for anoncvs anyway)... -sc
Well, would it be secure enough and reasonable from bandwidth utilization to
rsync the repository and/or nightly snapshots?
If it is reasonable in size people might accept either of these as an option
for anoncvs.
Or how about building cvsup on linux and distributing binary packages in 3
popular format, rpm/deb/tgz. Checkinstall does a pretty good job at that. So we
can cover as many users of anoncvs as possible.
Just a suggestion..
Bye
Shridhar
--
toilet toup'ee, n.: Any shag carpet that causes the lid to become top-heavy,
thus creating endless annoyance to male users. -- Rich Hall, "Sniglets"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2003-06-10 05:32:42 | Re: SQL question |
Previous Message | Jean-Christian Imbeault | 2003-06-10 03:39:55 | test |