Re: Estimate of when CVS will be available again?

From: "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Estimate of when CVS will be available again?
Date: 2003-06-10 05:12:25
Message-ID: 3EE5B611.13846.7FBC1C8@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 8 Jun 2003 at 23:52, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> Performance for cvs update over pserver is abysmal and pretty hard on
> the server, though easy on the client. If the cvs server gets bogged
> down, then it may be worth while to look into this and make a call for
> mirrors. Is this an issue? Putting the lock files on an mfs
> partition also helps (generally needed for anoncvs anyway)... -sc

Well, would it be secure enough and reasonable from bandwidth utilization to
rsync the repository and/or nightly snapshots?

If it is reasonable in size people might accept either of these as an option
for anoncvs.

Or how about building cvsup on linux and distributing binary packages in 3
popular format, rpm/deb/tgz. Checkinstall does a pretty good job at that. So we
can cover as many users of anoncvs as possible.

Just a suggestion..

Bye
Shridhar

--
toilet toup'ee, n.: Any shag carpet that causes the lid to become top-heavy,
thus creating endless annoyance to male users. -- Rich Hall, "Sniglets"

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2003-06-10 05:32:42 Re: SQL question
Previous Message Jean-Christian Imbeault 2003-06-10 03:39:55 test