Re: array support patch phase 1 patch

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: array support patch phase 1 patch
Date: 2003-06-02 15:01:00
Message-ID: 3EDB66AC.3070403@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm not sure though that any of these cases really are of concern. Do
> we care in any of them whether failure to find the operator is postponed
> till runtime? ANALYZE needs to know because it has a fallback path if
> there's no "<" operator, but ORDER BY does not.
>

I was thinking the same thing and hoping you'd say that. I'll send in an
updated patch later this morning once I've done a bit more testing.

Thanks,

Joe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2003-06-02 15:08:44 Re: array support patch phase 1 patch
Previous Message Kris Jurka 2003-06-02 14:09:02 Re: array support patch phase 1 patch