Re: - what protocol for an Internet postgres

From: Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>
To: Richard Welty <rwelty(at)averillpark(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: - what protocol for an Internet postgres
Date: 2003-05-14 17:22:27
Message-ID: 3EC27B53.7050503@mascari.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Richard Welty wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2003 11:54:49 -0500 Fernando Flores Prior <fprior(at)tlaloc(dot)imta(dot)mx> wrote:
>
>>Now I have a better vision of what can be accomplished with the
>>options that you gave me.
>
>
>>At 12:37 p.m. 14/05/2003 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>>However, from a security standpoint I don't think there's any question
>>>that you want to use SSL encryption for any database connection that
>>>passes over the open Internet. I seem to recall that the ODBC driver
>>>(still) doesn't support SSL --- if so, that would be reason enough not
>>>to use it. Or to invest the effort to fix it.
>
>
> i just caught the end of this.
>
> if for some reason you need to use a driver that doesn't support SSL (say,
> the aforementioned ODBC driver) there may be tunneling options that can be
> made to work, using tools such as ssh, stunnel, or IPSec.
>
> those are really more network engineering/sysadmin things than postgresql
> things, and the appropriate method will vary depending on circumstances.

If I recall correctly, ComandPrompt Inc. (www.commandprompt.com) sells
an SSL-enabled ODBC driver. I've never used it though...

Mike Mascari
mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message greg 2003-05-14 17:31:18 Re: fomatting an interval (resend)
Previous Message Doug McNaught 2003-05-14 17:18:05 Re: Status reporting for COPY