Re: JDBC 3.0 support?

From: Barry Lind <blind(at)xythos(dot)com>
To: Hanasaki JiJi <hanasaki(at)hanaden(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL JDBC - LIST <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: JDBC 3.0 support?
Date: 2003-05-07 02:47:42
Message-ID: 3EB873CE.9080605@xythos.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Hanasaki,

The driver is already 3.0 compliant for that. It correctly returns
false to DatabaseMetaData.supportsGetGeneratedKeys() indicating that
postgresql does not support this functionality. This isn't likely to
change unless some significant new functionality is introduced in the
server to do this. There isn't really anything the driver can do here
since the functionality doesn't exist in the database to automatically
return this information.

thanks,
--Barry

Hanasaki JiJi wrote:
> primarily - ResultSet resultSet = statement.getGeneratedKeys();
>
> Barry Lind wrote:
>
>> The driver does support jdbc3.0. However that support is not 100%
>> complete (but then neither is the jdbc2 nor jdbc1 support 100%
>> either). So the real question is what isn't there that you are
>> looking for?
>>
>> thanks,
>> --Barry
>>
>> Hanasaki JiJi wrote:
>>
>>> any target date for a JDBC3.0 compliant driver?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Barry Lind 2003-05-07 03:04:09 Re: Memroy leak with jdbc
Previous Message Hanasaki JiJi 2003-05-07 02:37:26 Re: JDBC 3.0 support?