Re: Longvarbinary

From: Amit Gollapudi <agollapudi(at)demandsolutions(dot)com>
To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Longvarbinary
Date: 2003-04-28 15:03:37
Message-ID: 3EAD42C9.50003@demandsolutions.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Since I have not heard back from anyone about this problem, I'm
including the tiny patch that fixed the problem for us. Can someone
with commit rights to the code verify and commit the patch? Please note
that the patch was created against the source for 7.3.2.

Thank you,
Amit Gollapudi
Demand Management, Inc.

Amit Gollapudi wrote:

>We ran across this problem a couple of weeks ago. Calling setObject
>with a "longvarbinary" type on a statement was causing an "Unknown Types
>value." SQLException. Is there any reason why the case statements at
>AbstractJdbc1Statement:1385 should not include Types.LONGVARBINARY? I'm
>fairly new to this codebase - so, it's possible I overlooked something
>obvious.
>
>Thank you,
>Amit Gollapudi
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
>http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
>
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
patch text/plain 876 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message J M Okomba 2003-04-28 15:23:30 Re: "Invalid character data was found"
Previous Message Diego Gil 2003-04-28 13:54:23 Re: setting postgres for java