Re: [HACKERS] More thoughts about FE/BE protocol

From: Wei Weng <wweng(at)kencast(dot)com>
To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] More thoughts about FE/BE protocol
Date: 2003-04-15 23:29:35
Message-ID: 3E9C95DF.2060205@kencast.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

>
>
>(a) the problems are "swapped in" now; if I don't continue with this
>work I'll probably forget a lot of the issues.
>
>(b) there are some things in 7.3 --- autocommit being a big one --- that we
>can *not* put off changing, or we'll be stuck with them forevermore.
>
>(c) the interfaces do not have to catch up in time for 7.4 release,
>because we'll still support the old protocol.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
>
What is this "auto-commit" about? Any place where I can read about it?

Thanks

Wei

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kurt Roeckx 2003-04-15 23:39:44 Re: Transaction problem?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-04-15 23:28:27 Re: Are we losing momentum?

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Grant Finnemore 2003-04-16 05:24:04 Re: First draft of new FE/BE protocol spec posted for comments
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-04-15 23:08:30 First draft of new FE/BE protocol spec posted for comments