Re: contrib and licensing

From: mlw <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: contrib and licensing
Date: 2003-04-02 22:16:03
Message-ID: 3E8B6123.2020105@mohawksoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>mlw <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> writes:
>
>
>>I know nothing in contrib should be GPL, I have no problem with that.
>>The question is the requirement of a GPL library to build a contrib project.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>My SOAP/XML function will probably require my LGPL library as there is a
>>lot of code I have written that I would need to implement it.
>>
>>
>
>If it won't work without your library then there's not much point in
>putting it into contrib. Might as well just put it in your library
>and distribute same as you have been doing.
>
>
I'm a little put off by this attitude, are you saying there are no LGPL
dependencies in PostgreSQL or /contrib?

If that is a real objective, I'm surprised.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2003-04-02 22:22:05 Re: contrib and licensing
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2003-04-02 21:55:56 Re: Dangling backends on win32 7.2.1 port (peerdirect).