Re: PL/Java

From: Laszlo Hornyak <lhornyakNOSPAM(at)ish(dot)hu>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PL/Java
Date: 2003-03-25 16:17:09
Message-ID: 3E808105.7090705@ish.hu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general

Hi!

I think we should not use the word "pl/java" since java is a trademark
of sun.
PL/pgJ is going to be distributed under Apache license. It is compatible
with 7.2+

Thanks,
Laszlo Hornyak

Joe Conway wrote:

> Robert Treat wrote:
>
>> http://techdocs.postgresql.org/guides/Pgplmeta
>>
>> If the language maintainers would be willing to look over the
>> information and make any corrections that would be great.
>
>
> Looks good to me. One minor note -- the URLs that I gave in the
> original email (and replicated on the above page) are to one specific
> mirror site:
>
> http://www.us.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.3/postgres/<whatever>
>
> It would probably be better to have them point to the corresponding
> idocs pages.
>
> Joe
>
>
>
>
> .
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message HORNYAK Laszlo 2003-03-25 16:56:27 postgres marketing in hungarian
Previous Message Robert Treat 2003-03-25 14:45:52 Re: [GENERAL] PL/Java (was: stored procedures)

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2003-03-25 16:17:22 Re: '' <> NULL
Previous Message Shridhar Daithankar<shridhar_daithankar@nospam.persistent.co.in> 2003-03-25 16:16:27 Re: trigger question.