From: | Laszlo Hornyak <lhornyakNOSPAM(at)ish(dot)hu> |
---|---|
To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PL/Java |
Date: | 2003-03-25 16:17:09 |
Message-ID: | 3E808105.7090705@ish.hu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
Hi!
I think we should not use the word "pl/java" since java is a trademark
of sun.
PL/pgJ is going to be distributed under Apache license. It is compatible
with 7.2+
Thanks,
Laszlo Hornyak
Joe Conway wrote:
> Robert Treat wrote:
>
>> http://techdocs.postgresql.org/guides/Pgplmeta
>>
>> If the language maintainers would be willing to look over the
>> information and make any corrections that would be great.
>
>
> Looks good to me. One minor note -- the URLs that I gave in the
> original email (and replicated on the above page) are to one specific
> mirror site:
>
> http://www.us.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.3/postgres/<whatever>
>
> It would probably be better to have them point to the corresponding
> idocs pages.
>
> Joe
>
>
>
>
> .
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | HORNYAK Laszlo | 2003-03-25 16:56:27 | postgres marketing in hungarian |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2003-03-25 14:45:52 | Re: [GENERAL] PL/Java (was: stored procedures) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2003-03-25 16:17:22 | Re: '' <> NULL |
Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar<shridhar_daithankar@nospam.persistent.co.in> | 2003-03-25 16:16:27 | Re: trigger question. |