| From: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: A bad behavior under autocommit off mode |
| Date: | 2003-03-20 04:22:21 |
| Message-ID: | 3E7941FD.8E9D10E7@tpf.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Neil Conway wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 18:55, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > > Does the change worth the trouble ?
> > > Please don't break BACKWARD COMPATIBILITY easily.
> >
> > If it's important enough, we can provide a GUC option for it.
> >
> > My guess is that a GUC option isn't needed, but then again we've been
> > criticized for disregarding backward compatibility in the past...
>
> I think our policy is going to be that GUC backward compatibility
> options have to be asked for during beta, unless it is obvious.
Why should we take the trouble to break the backward
compatibility in the first place ? The only reason
that I can see is that you dislike it.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
http://www.geocities.jp/inocchichichi/psqlodbc/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-03-20 04:23:58 | Re: A bad behavior under autocommit off mode |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-20 04:14:43 | Re: string || NULL ambiguity |