From: | Davide Romanini <romaz(at)libero(dot)it> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | The way Access/ODBC does updates to records |
Date: | 2003-03-17 19:16:00 |
Message-ID: | 3E761EF0.40901@libero.it |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
Hi,
When I link postgreSQL tables to access, and try to modify a record, I
found that odbc sends a query to postgresql containing a lot of fields
in the WHERE clause. For example:
I have a table names with fields id, name, surname, address.
When I modify an existing record changing the name from Davide to
Daniele, I expect that odbc sends a query like this:
UPDATE names SET name='Daniele' WHERE id=1;
or, in the case it looks for contamporary changes:
UPDATE names SET name='Daniele' WHERE id=1 AND name='Davide';
Instead I see it uses:
UPDATE names SET name='Daniele' WHERE id=1 AND name='Davide' AND
surname='Romanini' AND address='My address';
It wouldn't be a problem, but with some datatypes (dates, doubles for
example) and sometimes with triggers that change data before updates,
it has problems like the "Another user is changing the same data".
I want to know if there's a way to force access (or odbc) to use only
primary key fields in the WHERE clause for un UPDATE (there aren't
reasons to use other fields).
Thanks, Romaz
--
Davide Romanini
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | dziekan | 2003-03-18 09:36:31 | ODBC Level |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2003-03-17 13:46:59 | psqlODBC&unixODBC |