Re: Can someone respond to LWN comment?

From: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Scott Lamb <slamb(at)slamb(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Can someone respond to LWN comment?
Date: 2003-02-21 05:18:40
Message-ID: 3E55B6B0.5040609@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Scott Lamb wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
>> Someone responded to the 7.3.2 release announcement on LWN with a
>> question
>> about the poor security of postgresql. This was probably prompted by
>> the release information indicating some buffer overruns were fixed.
>> Anyway, it might be nice if someone official responded to the comment.
>> You can read the announcement and comment at:
>> http://lwn.net/Articles/22505/
>
>
> Well, I'm far from official, but I replied and hopefully helped a bit...

Yep, they were done well.

:-)

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jason Hihn 2003-02-21 15:28:23 MS SQL Licensing issues
Previous Message Scott Lamb 2003-02-21 04:58:27 Re: Can someone respond to LWN comment?