Re: location of the configuration files

From: mlw <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: location of the configuration files
Date: 2003-02-13 21:26:37
Message-ID: 3E4C0D8D.8040105@mohawksoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:

>mlw writes:
>
>
>
>>AFAIK it wasn't actually done. It was more of a, "we should do something
>>different" argument. At one point it was talked about rewriting the
>>configuration system to allow "include" and other things.
>>
>>
>
>The core of the problem was, and continues to be, this: If you move
>postgresql.conf somewhere else, then someone else will also want to move
>pg_hba.conf and all the rest. And that opens up a number of security and
>cumbersome-to-install problems.
>
>Just having an option that says, the configuration file is "there", is a
>first step but not a complete solution.
>
The location of pg_hba.conf and pg_ident.conf can be specified within
the postgresql.conf file if desired.

I don't understand the security concerns, what security issues can there be?

>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2003-02-13 21:32:36 Re: Brain dump: btree collapsing
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-02-13 21:25:49 Re: location of the configuration files