Re: location of the configuration files

From: mlw <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Kevin Brown <kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com>, Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>, Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>, Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>
Subject: Re: location of the configuration files
Date: 2003-02-13 19:51:27
Message-ID: 3E4BF73F.8020006@mohawksoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Treat wrote:

>On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 12:13, mlw wrote:
>
>
>>My patch only works on the PostgreSQL server code. No changes have been
>>made to the initialization scripts.
>>
>>The patch declares three extra configuration file parameters:
>>hbafile= '/etc/postgres/pg_hba.conf'
>>identfile='/etc/postgres/pg_ident.conf'
>>datadir='/RAID0/postgres'
>>
>>
>>
>
>If we're going to do this, I think we need to account for all of the
>files in the directory including PG_VERSION, postmaster.opts,
>postmaster.pid. In the end if we can't build so that we are either fully
>FHS compliant and/or LSB compliant, we've not done enough work on it.
>
>Robert Treat
>
>
>
>
postmaster.opts, PG_VERSION, and postmaster.pid are not configuration
parameters.

PG_VERSION is VERY important, it is how you know the version of the
database.
Postmaster.pid is a postgres writable value
AFAIK, postmaster.opts is also a postgres writable value.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Patrick Macdonald 2003-02-13 19:54:39 Re: Incremental backup
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2003-02-13 19:50:59 Re: location of the configuration files