| From: | mlw <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Kevin Brown <kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: location of the configuration files |
| Date: | 2003-02-13 15:59:11 |
| Message-ID: | 3E4BC0CF.7090108@mohawksoft.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>mlw <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> writes:
>
>
>>Here is the test, configure a server, with sendmail, named, apache, and
>>PostgreSQL. Tell me which of these systems doesn't configure right.
>>
>>
>
>AFAIK, only one of those four is designed to support multiple instances
>running on a single machine. This is not unrelated.
>
>
Also, using an explicit configuration file will also help you run
multiple postgresql's on the same machien in a consistent manner, for
instance:
postmaster -C /etc/postgres/common.conf -D /RAID0/postgres -p 5432
postmaster -C /etc/postgres/common.conf -D /RAID1/postgres -p 5433
Please, Tom, tell me why this is such a bad idea?
I will make the patch, I will submit it, will you guys put it in?
If not, why?
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2003-02-13 16:28:52 | Re: location of the configuration files |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-02-13 15:42:27 | Re: [HACKERS] postgresql 7.3 versus 7.2 |