Re: location of the configuration files

From: mlw <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
To: Peter Bierman <bierman(at)apple(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: location of the configuration files
Date: 2003-02-13 06:31:47
Message-ID: 3E4B3BD3.4080307@mohawksoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Bierman wrote:

> At 12:31 AM -0500 2/13/03, mlw wrote:
>
>> The idea that a, more or less, arbitrary data location determines the
>> database configuration is wrong. It should be obvious to any
>> administrator that a configuration file location which controls the
>> server is the "right" way to do it.
>
>
>
> Isn't the database data itself a rather significant portion of the
> 'configuration' of the database?
>
> What do you gain by having the postmaster config and the database data
> live in different locations?

While I don't like to use another product as an example, I think amongst
the number of things Oracle does right is that it has a fairly standard
way for an admin to find everything. All one needs to do is find the
"ORACLE_HOME" directory, and everything can be found from there.

If, assume, PostgreSQL worked like every other system. It would have
either an entry in /etc or some other directory specified by configure.

Somene please tell me how what I'm proposing differs from things like
sendmail, named, or anyother standards based UNIX server?

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message "." 2003-02-13 06:43:23 Re: postgresql 7.3 versus 7.2
Previous Message Neil Conway 2003-02-13 06:17:52 Re: [HACKERS] More benchmarking of wal_buffers