From: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Windows Build System - My final thoughts |
Date: | 2003-02-02 15:01:26 |
Message-ID: | 3E3D32C6.5010402@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Justin Clift wrote:
>
>> + Aside from all this, it might be nice to have a few Win32 specific
>>gui pieces in place at the time that PostgreSQL 7.4 Win32 is released.
>>Am sure they'll develop over time, but was thinking we should at least
>>make a good impression with the first release. Hey, if we make a really
>>bad impression with the first release, then there might not be the
>>quadruple-zillion Windows PG users after all. If that sounds like a
>>good idea, maybe adding the GUC variables "random_query_delay"
>>(minutes), "crash_how_often" (seconds), and "reboot_plus_corrupt_please"
>>(true/false)?
>
>
> What we need is for the backend to query postgresql.org to set those
> parameters, so we can control how many Win32 users adopt PostgreSQL. :-)
"All your [data] base belong to us" ?
;-)
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-02-02 15:24:03 | Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-02-02 14:18:05 | Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report |