Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System

From: mlw <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
To: Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System
Date: 2003-02-01 04:44:33
Message-ID: 3E3B50B1.7050305@mohawksoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dann Corbit wrote:

>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
>>Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 8:24 PM
>>To: mlw
>>Cc: Lamar Owen; Dann Corbit; PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List
>>Subject: Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System
>>
>>
>>mlw <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> writes:
>>
>>
>>>Like it or not, if PG releases a very good Win32 port, ALL the
>>>unixoids
>>>combined will be out numbered by the windoze users.
>>>
>>>
>>A lot of us are *not* looking forward to that prospect.
>>
>>
>
>In all seriousness, it may be a good idea to create a special list
>server group for that exact audience. Call it "Win32 PostgreSQL Users"
>or something like that. That way, then can help each other. And the
>experienced PG users that can stand the noise can pop over to help from
>time to time.
>
>You might have one million PG users in 6 months time. Literally.
>
no doubt

>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Clift 2003-02-01 05:08:31 Re: Windows Build System - My final thoughts
Previous Message mlw 2003-02-01 04:44:10 Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System