From: | Dmitry Tkach <dmitry(at)openratings(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Query performance PLEASE HELP |
Date: | 2003-01-31 20:07:39 |
Message-ID: | 3E3AD78B.5050002@openratings.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote:
>Dmitry Tkach <dmitry(at)openratings(dot)com> writes:
>
>>Explain analyze says:
>>
>
>>Limit (cost=61.91..61.91 rows=1 width=192) (actual time=439435.47..439435.50 rows=10 loops=1)
>> -> Sort (cost=61.91..61.91 rows=1 width=192) (actual time=439435.47..439435.48 rows=11 loops=1)
>> -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..61.90 rows=1 width=192) (actual time=7589.68..439423.75 rows=110 loops=1)
>> -> Index Scan using managed_supplier_idx on managed_supplier ms (cost=0.00..22.02 rows=5 width=157) (actual time=6.72..3009.90 rows=14365 loops=1)
>> -> Index Scan using tradestyle_duns_idx on tradestyle ts (cost=0.00..6.97 rows=1 width=35) (actual time=30.34..30.37 rows=0 loops=14365)
>>Total runtime: 439436.45 msec
>>
>
>Judging from the tiny cost estimates, the planner thinks these tables
>are tiny. Have you done a VACUUM ANALYZE lately?
>
Well... Yes. I am doing that daily. Actually, I was wonderring about
those estimates too, but that's not my primary concern right now -
perhaps, it should be, but, as far as I understand, the estimate only
matter for the query plan selection, and I don't have a problem with the
query plan - it seems fairly decent to me (as I said in the 'PS', the
other way around does make a little more sense to me, but it doesn't
seem to help much either)...
What I am primarily concerned about is the ACTUAL execution time - 30
milliseconds per row in that tradestyle table seems really excessive,
and 7 minutes total time just doesn't make any sense at all... Are you
saying this is the planner's problem? What do you think should the
correct plan look like then?
Thanks a lot!
Dima
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-01-31 20:13:06 | Re: Query performance PLEASE HELP |
Previous Message | Andy Kriger | 2003-01-31 20:03:59 | empty contrib diurectories? |