| From: | "Luke Lonergan" <LLonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 8.2 features status |
| Date: | 2006-08-07 02:59:07 |
| Message-ID: | 3E37B936B592014B978C4415F90D662D03FFE0AE@MI8NYCMAIL06.Mi8.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greg,
> As I've stated before, it sure would be nice if there was any
> possible way this could be done for 8.2. This would be a
> *huge* feature for
> 8.2 to have, and it frankly needs all the
> big-item-yet-easy-to-grasp features it can get. Is there any
> way this could be done if we threw money and/or people at the
> problem? I'm sure we could come up with both if the end goal
> was having built-in text searching for the next release.
Maybe you've said this before, but why is the current regexp support not
good enough? What kind of response time, etc, do you need?
- Luke
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-08-07 03:16:13 | Re: 8.2 features status |
| Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2006-08-07 02:45:15 | Re: 8.2 features status |