Re: v7.3.1 psql against a v7.2.x database ...

From: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: greg(at)turnstep(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: v7.3.1 psql against a v7.2.x database ...
Date: 2003-01-18 08:38:10
Message-ID: 3E291272.9050205@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>>With ever more larger businesses adopting PostgreSQL, and that leading
>>on to more places having several versions of PostgreSQL in operation
>>simultaneously (i.e. development vs production) we're probably going to
>>need to give psql the ability to handle whichever version of the PG
>>backend it happens to connect to.
>>
>>Marc's suggestion of breaking psql into it's own sub-project makes good
>>sense from that point of view.

Hey, good point. Giving psql the ability to handle multiple backend
versions could be done in a number of ways.

> Subproject or not, why don't we just rearrange psql to dynamically load a
> library of functions, eg:
>
> libpsql72.so
> libpsql73.so
> etc...
>
> And in them you have functions like:
>
> printTableDef();
> printViewDef();
> etc...

Is this very different from how it's done at present?

:-)

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

> Chris
>
>

--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-01-18 16:13:26 Re: Can we revisit the thought of PostgreSQL 7.2.4?
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2003-01-18 06:41:09 Re: Can we revisit the thought of PostgreSQL 7.2.4?