On 14 Jan 2003 at 23:43, Tom Lane wrote:
> But I fear the real problem is going to be that FLASH memory has a
> limited lifetime (measured in write cycles). Postgres is going to
> spend that lifetime with abandon, because it has absolutely no
> motivation to avoid disk writes. Are you prepared to replace the
> FLASH every so often?
What, roughly, is the limit?
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/