| From: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psql and readline |
| Date: | 2003-01-09 14:50:03 |
| Message-ID: | 3E1D8C1B.4070505@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Justin Clift wrote:
> b) Do we really want to go to the effort of adding a switch to revert to
> previous behaviour for something like this? It's almost definitely a
> win to have \e commands appear in the history, and seems a bit to
> trivial for adding switches for.
Bad wording there... "\e commands" is meant to mean "commands created
through using \e"
--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dan Langille | 2003-01-09 15:02:42 | Re: psql and readline |
| Previous Message | Justin Clift | 2003-01-09 14:46:49 | Re: psql and readline |