Re: Big 7.4 items

From: Janardhan <jana-reddy(at)mediaring(dot)com(dot)sg>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Patrick Macdonald <patrickm(at)redhat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, kward(at)peerdirect(dot)com, darren(at)up(dot)hrcoxmail(dot)com, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, jrnield(at)usol(dot)com
Subject: Re: Big 7.4 items
Date: 2002-12-17 02:35:49
Message-ID: 3DFE8D85.4050503@mediaring.com.sg
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

The file "ftp://candle.pha.pa.us/pub/postgresql/PITR_20020822_02.gz"
do not
have read permissions to copy. please provide the read permissions to copy.

Regards
jana

>Patrick Macdonald wrote:
>
>
>>Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I wanted to outline some of the big items we are looking at for 7.4:
>>>
>>>[snip]
>>>
>>>Point-In-Time Recovery (PITR)
>>>
>>> J. R. Nield did a PITR patch late in 7.3 development, and Patrick
>>> MacDonald from Red Hat is working on merging it into CVS and
>>> adding any missing pieces. Patrick, do you have an ETA on that?
>>>
>>>
>>Neil Conway and I will be working on this starting the beginning
>>of January. By the middle of January, we hope to have a handle on
>>an ETA.
>>
>>
>
>Ewe, that is later than I was hoping. I have put J.R's PITR patch up
>at:
>
> ftp://candle.pha.pa.us/pub/postgresql/PITR_20020822_02.gz
>
>(I have tried to contact J.R. several times over the past few months,
>with no reply.)
>
>J.R felt it was ready to go. I would like to have an evaluation of the
>patch to know what it does and what is missing. I would like that
>sooner rather than later because:
>
> o I want to avoid too much code drift
> o I don't want to find there are major pieces missing and to
> not have enough time to implement them in 7.4
> o It is a big feature so I would like sufficient testing before beta
>
>OK, I just talked to Patrick on the phone, and he says Neil Conway is
>working on merging the code into 7.3, and adding missing pieces like
>logging table creation. So, it seems PITR is moving forward. Neil, can
>you comment on where you are with this, and what still needs to be done?
>Do we need to start looking at log archiving options? How is the PITR
>log contents different from the WAL log contents, except of course no
>pre-write page images?
>
>If we need to discuss things, perhaps we can do it now and get folks
>working on other pieces, or at least thinking about them.
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-12-17 03:26:54 Re: Big 7.4 items
Previous Message Gavin Sherry 2002-12-17 02:17:49 Re: Password security question