| From: | "Dan Langille" <dan(at)langille(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Advocacy Mailing List <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Need a better way to word this statement for the press release |
| Date: | 2002-11-24 14:57:25 |
| Message-ID: | 3DE0A285.31533.CD7950E6@localhost |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 24 Nov 2002 at 20:13, Justin Clift wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> There's a line in the draft Press Release for version 7.3 that says:
>
> - Dozens of performance enhancements and bug fixes to maintain
> PostgreSQL's leading position in ORDMBSs.
I have just awaken, but how about:
In keeping with its leading position amongst ORDMBSs, the team has
undertaken over 70 performance enhancing changes to make PostgreSQL
even faster than before.
- adjust that number to reflect reality.
- That doesn't mention bug fixes, but perhaps that should be
mentioned in another statement? Like what you said below?
> Perhaps:
>
> - Dozens of performance enhancements to maintain PostgreSQL's
> leading position in ORDMBSs.
> - All known bugs fixed.
>
> Except that "all known bugs fixed" isn't right. There's still that
> "to_cash()" bug isn't there?
I an not familiar with it. Is it a bug or a mis-documented feature?
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2002-11-24 16:05:55 | Re: Need a better way to word this statement for the press release |
| Previous Message | Justin Clift | 2002-11-24 09:13:18 | Need a better way to word this statement for the press release |